Source: www.GutterUncensoredPlus.com
Climate-Gate exposed! Last week, hackers apparently from Russia published over 160mb of scientific emails, documents and source code taken from the primary "climate research unit," at the University of East Anglia, which is the center of UN/IPCC-promoted global warming alarmism. Now a picture emerges of a big funding scam to funnel hundreds billions of dollars for the purposes of an underlying international political agenda. It is being called the greatest scientific scandal of the modern age. The degree of collusion between big media, the UN, corporate executives, politicians and corrupt scientists involved is massive. If you are interested in this international conspiracy or if you like to read people's confidential emails, please see the download links below.
Download the Emails And Documents Below!
Hackers have apparently hacked into an university email server and gotten a large number of emails and documents belonging to prominent man-made global warming advocates, most of whom are associated with the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The documents were then made available to the public from a Russian server. Did the global warming advocates and scientists manipulate data? What the emails and data prove is shocking, and may represent the greatest scandal in the history of science. I have read through a handful of the emails. And it doesn't look good for these prominent scientists. I randomly picked one file, and found this tidbit from Kevin Trenberth, National Center for Atmospheric Research:
"The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't. The CERES data... shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate"Not shocking enough? Here is another email, this one from Prof. Phil Jones at the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia:
"Once Tim’s got a diagram here we’ll send that either later today or first thing tomorrow.And computer hackers have published over 1,000 other emails and source code from the UN-affiliated Climate Research Unit (CRU) showing profound corruption, fraud, and criminal activity. What's really behind the Copenhagen treaty? In the emails, these UN-funded scientists talk about deleting data under FOIA request, faking data for journals such as Nature, conspiring to keep opposing science out of peer-reviewed journals (which they controlled the editorial boards), using "tricks" to "hide the [cooling period]" etc. A prominent German scientist who was attacked in the leaked CRU emails by UN affiliated climate scientists has stated that the group behind the emails should be barred from taking part in the peer-review process and excluded from the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for falsifying data. Professor Hans von Storch, who is referred to in very unflattering terms several times in the leaked emails, points out that the CRU scientists acted as "gatekeepers." The Guardian UK report:I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) amd from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline. Mike’s series got the annual land and marine values while the other two got April-Sept for NH land N of 20N. The latter two are real for 1999, while the estimate for 1999 for NH combined is +0.44C wrt 61-90. The Global estimate for 1999 with data through Oct is +0.35C cf. 0.57 for 1998."
Hundreds of private emails and documents allegedly exchanged between some of the world's leading climate scientists during the past 13 years have been stolen by hackers and leaked online, it emerged today.Even the NY Times felt compelled to write about this news. They may want to claim that it is "not something secret," but the term "hide the decline" makes that difficult to accept.
The computer files were apparently accessed earlier this week from servers at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, a world-renowned centre focused on the study of natural and anthropogenic climate change.
Climate change sceptics who have studied the emails allege they provide "smoking gun" evidence that some of the climatologists colluded in manipulating data to support the widely held view that climate change is real, and is being largely caused by the actions of mankind.
The veracity of the emails has not been confirmed and the scientists involved have declined to comment on the story, which broke on a blog called The Air Vent.
The files, which in total amount to 160MbB of data, were first uploaded on to a Russian server, before being widely mirrored across the internet. The emails were accompanied by the anonymous statement: "We feel that climate science is, in the current situation, too important to be kept under wraps. We hereby release a random selection of correspondence, code and documents. Hopefully it will give some insight into the science and the people behind it."
A spokesperson for the University of East Anglia said: "We are aware that information from a server used for research information in one area of the university has been made available on public websites. Because of the volume of this information we cannot currently confirm that all this material is genuine. This information has been obtained and published without our permission and we took immediate action to remove the server in question from operation. We are undertaking a thorough internal investigation and have involved the police in this inquiry."
In one email, dated November 1999, one scientist wrote: "I've just completed Mike's Nature [the science journal] trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie, from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline."
This sentence, in particular, has been leapt upon by sceptics as evidence of manipulating data, but the credibility of the email has not been verified. The scientists who allegedly sent it declined to comment on the email.
"It does look incriminating on the surface, but there are lots of single sentences that taken out of context can appear incriminating," said Bob Ward, director of policy and communications at the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at the London School of Economics. "You can't tell what they are talking about. Scientists say 'trick' not just to mean deception. They mean it as a clever way of doing something - a short cut can be a trick."
In another alleged email, one of the scientists apparently refers to the death of a prominent climate change sceptic by saying "in an odd way this is cheering news".
Ward said that if the emails are correct, they "might highlight behaviour that those individuals might not like to have made public." But he added, "Let's separate out [the climate scientists] reacting badly to the personal attacks [from sceptics] to the idea that their work has been carried out in an inappropriate way."
The revelations did not alter the huge body of evidence from a variety of scientific fields that supports the conclusion that modern climate change is caused largely by human activity, Ward said. The emails refer largely to work on so-called paleoclimate data - reconstructing past climate scenarios using data such as ice cores and tree rings. "Climate change is based on several lines of evidence, not just paleoclimate data," he said. "At the heart of this is basic physics."
Ward pointed out that the individuals named in the alleged emails had numerous publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals. "It would be very surprising if after all this time, suddenly they were found out doing something as wrong as that."
Professor Michael Mann, director of Pennsylvania State University's Earth System Science Centre and a regular contributor to the popular climate science blog Real Climate, features in many of the email exchanges. He said: "I'm not going to comment on the content of illegally obtained emails. However, I will say this: both their theft and, I believe, any reproduction of the emails that were obtained on public websites, etc, constitutes serious criminal activity. I'm hoping the perpetrators and their facilitators will be tracked down and prosecuted to the fullest extent the law allows."
When the Guardian asked Prof Phil Jones at UEA, who features in the correspondence, to verify whether the emails were genuine, he refused to comment.
The alleged emails illustrate the persistent pressure some climatologists have been under from sceptics in recent years. There have been repeated calls, including Freedom of Information requests, for the Climate Research Unit to make public a confidential dataset of land and sea temperature recordings that is "value added" by the unit before being used by the Met Office. The emails show the frustration some climatologists have had at having to operate under such intense, often politically motivated, scrutiny.
Prof Bob Watson, the chief scientific advisor at the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said, "Evidence for climate change is irrefutable. The world's leading scientists overwhelmingly agree what we're experiencing is not down to natural variation."
"With this overwhelming scientific body of evidence failing to take action to tackle climate change would be the wrong thing to do – the impacts here in Britain and across the world will worsen and the economic consequences will be catastrophic."
A spokesman for Greenpeace said: "If you looked through any organisation's emails from the last 10 years you'd find something that would raise a few eyebrows. Contrary to what the sceptics claim, the Royal Society, the US National Academy of Sciences, Nasa and the world's leading atmospheric scientists are not the agents of a clandestine global movement against the truth. This stuff might drive some web traffic, but so does David Icke."
But several scientists and others contacted by The New York Times confirmed that they were the authors or recipients of specific e-mail messages included in the file. The revelations are bound to inflame the public debate as hundreds of negotiators prepare to negotiate an international climate accord at meetings in Copenhagen next month, and at least one scientist speculated that the timing was not coincidental.CRU authorities requested for police assistance in their investigation into the unauthorized climate research data leak of internal documents. LOL... Hopefully the police investigate them for conspiring to defraud the people of the world. Watch the videos below then download the leaked emails.
Dr. Trenberth said Friday that he was appalled at the release of the e-mail messages.
But he added that he thought the revelations might backfire against climate skeptics. He said that he thought that the messages showed “the integrity of scientists.” Still, some of the comments might lend themselves to being interpreted as sinister.
In a 1999 e-mail exchange about charts showing climate patterns over the last two millenniums, Phil Jones, a longtime climate researcher at the East Anglia Climate Research Unit, said he had used a “trick” employed by another scientist, Michael Mann, to “hide the decline” in temperatures.
Dr. Mann, a professor at Pennsylvania State University, confirmed in an interview that the e-mail message was real. He said the choice of words by his colleague was poor but noted that scientists often used the word “trick” to refer to a good way to solve a problem, “and not something secret.”
At issue were sets of data, both employed in two studies. One data set showed long-term temperature effects on tree rings; the other, thermometer readings for the past 100 years. . . .
Leaked Emails Expose Global Warming Manipulation And Fraud
One Zip File containing 4,558 sub-files - File Size: 62 MB compressed (157 MB)
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=7PD0EUMK
or
http://www.sendspace.com/file/mrxx19
or
http://rapidshare.com/files/312243073/FOI2009_www.GutterUncensoredPlus.com.zip
or
http://www.usaupload.net/d/b7u3rh0q2aq
or
http://depositfiles.com/files/sn6glvf6p
or
http://fileshost.com/download.php?id=0C3A1D211
or
http://hotfile.com/dl/18637321/363f801/FOI2009_www.GutterUncensoredPlus.com.zip.html
Source: http://www.GutterUncensoredPlus.com
